Sosyal İstenirliğin Çevreci Duyarlılık, Tutum ve Davranışlar Üzerindeki Etkisi; Doğa Tabanlı Tur Katılımcıları Örneği (Effect of Social Desirability on Environmental Sensitivity, Attitude and Behavior; The Case of Nature Based Tour Participants)

Authors

  • Burhan ÇINAR
  • Alper DURAN
  • Hülya TAŞTAN

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21325/jotags.2019.445

Keywords:

Impression management, Self-deception, Environmental sensitivity, Environmental attitude, Environmental behavior

Abstract

Individuals' thoughts and actions on environmental issues are influenced by a wide range of factors. In this study, the effects of impression management and self-deception, which are the sub-dimensions of social desirability, on environmental sensitivity, attitude and behavior are examined in the case of nature-based tour participants. The data were collected by questionnaire from 325 people who participated in nature-based tours in Mersin according to convenience sampling technique. Correlation and linear regression analysis were used in the analysis of the obtained data. According to the results of the research, both impression management and self-deception have a weak and significant effect on environmental sensitivity, attitude, and behavior.

References

Altunışık, R.,Coşkun, R., Bayraktaroğlu, S. ve Yıldırım, E. (2012). Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma Yöntemleri (SPSS uygulamalı). Sakarya: Sakarya Yayıncılık.

Akın, A. (2010). İki boyutlu sosyal istenirlik ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi ve psikometrik özelliklerinin araştırılması. Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 30(3), 771-784.

Ajzen, I. ve Fishbein, M. (1977). Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin, 84(5), 888.

Beckmann SC (2005) In the eye of the beholder: Danish consumercitizens and sustainability. İçinde Grunert, K.G., Thøgersen, J. (Editörler), Consumers, policy and the environment: a tribute to Folke Ölander (ss. 265–299). Berlin: Springer.

Costarelli, S. ve Colloca, P. (2004) The effects of attitudinal ambivalence on pro-environmental behavioural intentions. Journal of Environmental Psychology 24(3), 279–288

Crowne, D. P. ve Marlowe, D. (1964). The approval motive. New York: Wiley.

Dunlap, R.E., Van Liere, K.D., Mertig, A.G., Jones, R.E. (2000), Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: a revised NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 425-42.

Felonneau, M. ve Becker, M., 2008. Pro-environmental attitudes and behavior: revealing perceived social desirability. Revue Internationale Psychologie Sociale. 21(4), 25-53.

Hartig, T., Kaiser, F.G., Bowler, P.A. (2001). Psychological restoration in nature as a positive motivation for ecological behavior. Environment and Behavior, 33(4), 590–607.

Kaiser, F.G., Ranney, M., Hartig, T., Bowler, P.A. (1999) Ecological behavior, environmental attitude, and feelings of responsibility for the environment. European Psychologist, 4(2), 59–74.

Karasar, N. (2013). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi. Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık.

Mayer, F.S., Frantz, C.M. (2004) The connectedness to nature scale: a measure of individuals feeling in community with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24 (49), 503–515.

Milfont, T.L. (2009). The effects of social desirability on self-reported environmental attitudes and ecological behaviour. Environmentalist, 29, 263-269.

Pato, C., Ros, M., Troccoli, B., Tamayo, A. (2004). Environmental beliefs: an empirical validation with Brazilian students. Paper presented at the 18th conference of the international association for peopleenvironmentstudies, Vienna.

Paulhus, D.L. (1984). Two components of socially desirable responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 598–609.

Paulhus, D. L. (1991). Measurement and control of response bias. İçinde J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver ve L. S. Wrightsman (Editörler.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (ss. 17–59). San Diego, CA: Academic.

Pauls, C. A. ve Stemmler, G. (2003). Substance and bias in social desirability responding. Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 263–275.

Sackeim, H. A. ve Gur, R. C. (1978). Self-deception, self-confrontation, and consciousness. İçinde G. E. Schwartz ve D. Shapiro (Editörler), Consciousness and self-regulation: Advances in Research (ss. 139–197). New York: Plenum Press.

Sağlam, A. (2012). Çalışanların ve Yöneticilerin Sosyal İstenirlik ve Özgünlük Düzeylerinin Karşılaştırılması. (Basılmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). İstanbul: Maltepe Üniversitesi, Psikoloji Ana Bilim Dalı.

Schahn, J. (2002). The role of behavioral costs and social desirability as predictors of environmental attitudes and conservation behavior: an analysis on aggregate and on individual data level. Zeitschrift fur Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 23, 45–54.

Singh, N. (2009), Exploring socially responsible behaviour of indian consumers – an empirical investigation. Social Responsibility Journal, 5(2), 200-11.

Stern P.C. ve Oskamp, S. (1987). Managing scarce environmental resources. İçinde Stokols. D., Altman., I. (editörler) Handbook of environmental psychology, vol 2. (ss. 1043–1088). Wiley: New York.

Tarfaouı, D. ve Zkım, S. (2017). Ecological Attitude- Behavior Gap: A Theoretical Analysis. International Journal of Economics & Strategic Management of Business Process (ESMB), 8(1), 33-38.

Tarrant, M.A., Cordell H.K. (1997). The effect of respondent characteristics on general environmental attitude-behavior correspondence. Environment Behavior, 29, 618–637.

Thøgersen, J., ve Ölander, F. (2006) To what degree are environmentally beneficial choices reflective of a general conservation stance? Environment and Behavior 38(4), 550–569.

Uzzell, D. ve Rathzel, N. (2008), Changing relations in global environmental change, Proceedings of the Berlin Conference on the Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change, ss. 1-18.

Vining, J., ve Ebreo, A. (1992). Predicting recycling behavior from global and specific environmental attitudes and changes in recycling opportunities. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22, 1580-1607.

Yılmaz, V., Çelik, H.E., Yağızer, C. (2009). Çevresel duyarlılık ve çevresel davranışın ekolojikürün satın alma davranışına etkilerinin yapısal eşitlik modeliyle araştırılması. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 9(2), 1-14.

Wallace, D. S., Paulson, R. M., Lord, C. G., Bond Jr, C. F. (2005). Which Behaviors Do Attitudes Predict? Meta-Analyzing the Effects of Social Pressure and Perceived Difficulty. Review of General Psychology, 9(3), 214.

Wiseman M, Bogner FX (2003) A higher-order model of ecological values and its relationship to personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 34(5), 783–794.

Published

02/08/2023

How to Cite

ÇINAR, B. ., DURAN, A., & TAŞTAN, H. (2023). Sosyal İstenirliğin Çevreci Duyarlılık, Tutum ve Davranışlar Üzerindeki Etkisi; Doğa Tabanlı Tur Katılımcıları Örneği (Effect of Social Desirability on Environmental Sensitivity, Attitude and Behavior; The Case of Nature Based Tour Participants). Journal of Tourism & Gastronomy Studies, 7(3), 1727–1736. https://doi.org/10.21325/jotags.2019.445